Saturday, March 24, 2007

I hate short changeovers

I've just finished nights, and next week I'm on days. I do two weeks of days where I get up at sixish and get home anywhere between 4pm & 6pm; followed by two weeks of nights, starting at 8:30pm and getting home around 5am. Except Friday nights, where I start and finish 2 hours earlier.
This means I have four different kinds of weekends:
  1. days-days, which is a normal weekend
  2. days-nights, which is almost an extra day (I try to get a bit of kip in on the Monday, but not always)
  3. nights-nights, where being a family man, I have to turn my body clock around for a couple of days
  4. nights-days, which is like losing half your weekend (especially this week, when the clocks go forward).
    I embark on a week of nights by having a lateish night Sunday, getting up at about 8am-ish (when the kids go to school), hopefully getting a couple of hours kip in the afternoon, and then hammering my body clock into submission by working all night. It takes me a couple of days to get the swing of things, which means that by the end of Friday night (about 3-4am), I'm still wide awake. I can't sleep straight after work at the best of times. I can't usually get to sleep before 5ish, so I don't wake up again till half of Saturday's gone. Bah.
    Then again, Easter weekend is a type 2 weekend, so I've almost got a 5 day weekend. Bargain.

    Monday, March 19, 2007

    SitePoint Blogs » Adobe CS2 and the Case of the Disappearing Thumbnails!

    SitePoint Blogs » Adobe CS2 and the Case of the Disappearing Thumbnails!

    This page tells you how to get Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop CS2 to display thumbnail icons in Windows Explorer. Useful stuff.

    Sunday, March 04, 2007

    What is a classic car?

    With cars from the early 80's coming up for 25 years old now, this is a question that keeps coming up. Cars from this era are the early consumer cars, with ECUs and ABS, comfortable, reliable, economical and kind of soulless, really. My daily driver, a 55 plate Toyota Corolla, ticks all of these boxes. It's a nice car to drive, but only inasmuch as it's effortless and doesn't detract from the purpose of the journey. The enjoyment comes when you get to B, not necessarily in the drive from A to B. Although a good song on the stereo helps.

    Because of this, there is an arguement that early 80's cars aren't 'classic' cars. Here in the UK in the mid 90's, cars 25 years or older became exempt from road tax. This was frozen in 1997, when the current Labour government came to power, and now only cars built before 1973 (I think) are exempt. There is a call to restore this 25 year exemption, and herein lies the rub. In 2007, 25 year old cars tend to be in better condition than in years gone by. So there are more 25 year old common or garden consumer cars around, which many people would not consider classics. Having said that, the throwaway consumer society means that older consumer cars are being scrapped before they're truly worn out, as the cost of replacing expensive components is more than the value of the car.

    There is an element of agism, in that an Austin 1100 is more likely to be considered a classic than a Metro, but both are small family cars. My TR7 wouldn't be considered a classic by some owners of earlier TRs. On this page of his 1941 Buick restoration, Matt laments the scarcity of '40s cars at American classics shows, being underwhelmed by 'ordinary' cars from the '50, '60s and '70s. But then his Buick wouldn't have been considered a classic in the '40s.

    To me, 'classic' is a bit of a cliche. A better word would be 'cherished', in that a cherished car is a car used and maintained for the love of the car itself. Of course this definition includes chavved-up Corsas, so for older cars (say 25-30 years old) I'd favour the term 'historic'.

    And tax exemption? For purely selfish reasons (my TR7 is 26 years old), I support the 25 year cutoff being restored, but maybe the cutoff date only changing every 5 years or so.

    Saturday, March 03, 2007

    New boxes

    We got a V+ box installed today. That went well, but the separate cable modem (needed because unlike the Samsung cable box, a V+ box has no modem built in) took me all morning to set up after being passed around ntl's Virgin Media's phone system, including an internal tech support section. Eventually I got through to a helpful chap who said "I see the problem. There you go, it should work now." And it did. The old Samsung box, which they moved upstairs because crazily enough it's cheaper to have a V+ box installed and the old box moved (£5 a month x 12 = £60) than to pay to have the old box taken away (£75), still doesn't work. Must ring Virgin tomorrow.